California has changed the rules for Application fees, how applications must be processed, and what landlords must do when they decline an applicant in 2025. AB 2493 effectively makes “first come first served” a requirement rather than just Fair Housing’s recommendation.
AB 2493 Also changes the way Landlords respond to declined applicants in 3 ways:
We are evicting less than 1 tenant a year with 1200 doors under management so literally 99.9% of our tenants do not get evicted each year. We attribute that to our excellent applicant screening process which, until now, utilized a “strongest applicant” process rather than “first come first served”. AB 2493 will force us to modify our process.
AB 2493 was authored and passed by Democrats. It passed with 57 Democrat votes and 3 Republicans (while 10 Republicans voted against it), and of course, signed into law by our Democrat Governor.
The drive for this legislation came from stories of applicants who paid application fees 20 times before finding a home ($1000). They were often those who could least afford it.
Until now, Fair Housing has recommended “first come first served”, but it was not the law. “Strongest applicant” policy is allowed as long as the screening criteria is applied equally and in accordance with Fair Housing law.
To be clear, AB 2493 does not say you cannot have a “strongest applicant” screening policy - but it does say you must refund every application fee to declined applicants for any reason if you do not have a “first come first served policy”.
When a Landlord meets all 4 of those considerations, they can then keep the Application fee - even if the tenant is declined.
If a landlord wants to retain a “strongest applicant” screening policy, they can (just apply your criteria equally and legally), BUT THEN YOU MUST REFUND EVERY APPLICATION FEE FOR EVERY DECLINED APPLICANT REGARDLESS OF THE REASON.
The refund must go back within 7 days of you selecting a different applicant - or 30 days from when the application was submitted - whichever is first.
I considered not charging for application fees so that I could keep my better “strongest applicant” policy. Then I did the numbers. Tiner Properties would lose over $140K per year if we did not charge for application fees.
Applicants think we make a killing on application fees - but we actually lose money on them. Just the cost for running the credit report and averaging the cost of my applicant screening staff, I lose money on application fees - and there are many more costs than that. From a business perspective - it is not feasible to maintain a strongest applicant policy any longer.
On the “no” side: Landlords are statistically better off with an overqualified applicant that has an 820 credit score, no debt, and a $15K monthly income - than a barely qualified applicant who arrived first with a 700 credit score, considerable consumer debt, and a $9K monthly income. The odds of late rents, eviction, rehab… all go up with the first applicant compared to the “strongest applicant”.
On the “yes” side: A “strongest applicant” policy has become increasingly more risky. Almost every declined applicant could file a Fair Housing complaint saying you declined them for some protected status in the law (Race, color, religion, sex, family status and disability, gender expression, sexual orientation etc) Fair Housing even has a testing program to seek out non-compliance. Tenant advocacy groups are assisting declined applicants, helping them file civil rights complaints… It is time consuming and expensive to respond to a complaint - even when you have done everything right. The risk of such a complaint is lower for landlords who have a “first come first served policy”. From a cost perspective, compliance in this regard may save landlords money and grief.
Here is a link to AB 2493.
Disclosure: I am not an attorney and Tiner Property management is not a law firm. Do not consider this video/blog legal advice - seek legal advice from an attorney for your particular situation.
How to contact us: If you need help with your rental and would like to hire Tiner Property Management, please reach out to us by calling 916-974-6003 or by email: Info@tiner.com or check us out on our website: tiner.com
In office visits by appointment only.
FOLSOM - GRANITE BAY - ROSEVILLE - ROCKLIN - LINCOLN - EL DORADO HILLS - CAMERON PARK
CARMICHAEL - FAIR OAKS - ORANGEVALE - CITRUS HEIGHTS - GOLD RIVER - ARDEN-ARCADE - LA RIVIERA - ROSEMONT
NATOMAS
-
RANCHO CORDOVA
-
MATHER
- ELK GROVE -
ANTELOPE
-
FOOTHILL FARMS
-
NORTH HIGHLANDS - RIO LINDA
-
ELVERTA
SACRAMENTO
-
DOWNTOWN
-
MIDTOWN
-
EAST SACRAMENTO -
WEST SACRAMENTO
-
TAHOE PARK
-
LAND PARK
Disclaimer: Neither Tiner Properties, Inc. nor John Tiner, nor Tiner Properties Real Estate represent any content on this website, including videos, as legal advice. It is shared as informational only and it is up to the user to use this information responsibly. We recommend the user seek legal advice before relying on any information herein. All content expresses the views of the author as of the date indicated and such views are subject to change without notice. We have no duty or obligation to update the information contained herein. All information is being made available for educational and entertainment purposes only and should not be used for any other purpose. We believe the information contained is reliable, however we cannot guarantee the accuracy of such information and we have not independently verified the accuracy or completeness of any information given. This information may not be copied or used in whole or in part, in any form without prior written consent.